north rim of the Grand Canyon

2025 Western Assessment Supplemental Information

Introduction

WECC's annual Western Assessment of Resource Adequacy provides a high-level examination of resource-adequacy-related risks to the reliability of the Western Interconnection over the next 10 years. Through an energy-based probabilistic approach, WECC examines the risks across the entire interconnection and eight subregions. This work is intended to help stakeholders target specific areas and topics for deeper evaluation and mitigation. The 10-year assessment period for this year's Western Assessment is 2026 through 2035.

This supplemental material provides a more in-depth look at the eight subregions that make up the Western Interconnection, with information on resource portfolio, demand projections, planned resource additions and retirements, and how the subregion fared in WECC's analysis. All times listed are Pacific Time.

Scenarios

WECC performed six scenarios in the 2025 Western Assessment, using data provided by WECC members as of the end of 2024. This information included planned resource additions and retirements over the coming decade, as well as demand forecasts for the 10-year assessment period.

The “All Additions” scenario evaluated resource adequacy assuming all planned resource additions and retirements come to fruition, while three scenarios reduced the planned resource additions. Resource additions in these scenarios were based on capacity decreases of 5%, 15%, and 33%, respectively. These scenarios are called the “95% Additions,” “85% Additions,” and the “67% Additions” scenarios. The reduction in resource additions was applied evenly to each resource type and subregion. Demand forecasts in these scenarios were unaltered for the assessment period and reflect annual and peak demand projections as of year-end 2024.

The remaining two scenarios focused on demand in the years 2030 and 2035. The “High Load Scenario" incorporates large load customer demand that was not included in original demand forecasts due to uncertainty in customer materialization. The additional demand from these customers is modeled as being present 24/7, year-round. Resource additions were not altered in the High Load scenario.

Large load demand added to the peak and annual demand forecasts in the High Load Scenario.

Large load demand added to the peak and annual demand forecasts in the High Load Scenario.

The “Low Load Scenario" applies percentage reductions to peak and annual demand forecasts in 2030 and 2035. The reductions are seasonal for the peak hour forecasts and applied evenly to the annual demand forecasts. The shoulder season reductions for the peak hour are an average of the summer and winter percentage reductions. The percentages chosen represent an approximation of the typical high-side forecasting error for peak and annual demand. They are shown below. Resource additions were not altered in the Low Load Scenario:

Reductions to peak and annual demand forecasts in the Low Load Scenario

Reductions to peak and annual demand forecasts in the Low Load Scenario

Results

Resource adequacy metrics, such as loss of load events (LOLEv), loss of load hours (LOLH), expected unserved energy (EUE), and duration of loss of load events, were derived for each scenario by subregion and are provided below for years 2030 and 2035.

Loss of Load Events

LOLEvs by subregion and scenario for 2030

LOLEvs by subregion and scenario for 2030

An LOLEv is a period during which system load cannot be served. The Northwest contains the greatest LOLEvs across all scenarios. Both Basin and the Northwest encounter LOLEvs as early as 2029 in the All Additions Scenario, however only the Northwest shows LOLEvs in 2030. When 3 GW of speculative large load demand is added to the Northwest subregion in the High Load Scenario, the Northwest’s LOLEvs increase dramatically. It should also be noted that when demand is reduced in the Low Load Scenario, there is a singular LOLEv for the Northwest in 2030. This is noteworthy as the Low Load Scenario incorporates all planned resource additions. The Rocky Mountain subregion has one LOLEv in 2030 in the 67% Additions Scenario.

LOLEvs by subregion and scenario for 2035

LOLEvs by subregion and scenario for 2035

Examining the 2035 LOLEvs, California and Mexico show loss of load in the 67% Additions Scenario. California has one LOLEv in 2032 and 2033, and two LOLEvs in 2035. Mexico has one LOLEv in 2034 and 19 LOLEvs in 2035. The Rocky Mountain subregion shows 18 LOLEvs in 2035 in the 67% Additions Scenario and shows an LOLEv in 2034 and 2035 in the 85% Additions Scenario. The Northwest shows LOLEvs across all scenarios in 2035, with the greatest amount shown in the High Load Scenario. The High Load Scenario features over 3.5 GW of additional consumer demand for the Northwest subregion in 2035, driving this increase. The Northwest is also the only subregion showing LOLEvs in 2035 for the Low Load Scenario. Basin shows LOLEvs in all scenarios except the Low Load Scenario.

Loss of Load Hours

LOLHs by subregion and scenario for 2030

LOLHs by subregion and scenario for 2030

LOLHs are the number of hours a subregion’s demand is projected to exceed generating capability. LOLHs for each scenario in 2030 are provided below. Results viewed through the lens of LOLHs are generally similar to those of LOLEvs, in that the Northwest and Basin subregions show most of the LOLHs. It is noteworthy in the 2030 67% Additions Scenario that Basin displayed more LOLEvs; however, the Northwest subregion shows greater LOLHs. This indicates the Northwest is generally experiencing longer LOLEvs. In the 2030 67% Additions Scenario, the average length of time per LOLEv in the Northwest is close to four hours, whereas, for Basin, LOLEvs average about two hours. The Northwest shows over 200 LOLHs in the High Load Scenario with 46 LOLEvs, increasing the average length of LOLEv to almost five hours. Rocky Mountain has one LOLH in 2030 in the 67% Additions Scenario.

LOLHs by subregion and scenario for 2035

LOLHs by subregion and scenario for 2035

Comparing 2035 to 2030, LOLHs increase across the board in all scenarios. Basin and the Northwest show LOLHs in the All Additions Scenario, whereas Rocky Mountain has LOLHs in the 85% Additions Scenario. The Northwest shows over 700 LOLHs in the High Load Scenario, and similar to the 2030 High Load Scenario, averages approximately five hours per LOLEv. The Northwest also shows seven LOLHs in the Low Load Scenario. Basin shows 147 LOLHs in the 67% Additions Scenario spread over 53 LOLEvs, averaging about three LOLHs per LOLEv. California shows two LOLHs in the 2035 67% Additions Scenario, whereas Mexico shows 51 LOLHs. The 51 LOLHs for Mexico were spread over 19 LOLEvs, resulting in an average duration of about three hours per LOLEv.

Expected Unserved Energy

EUE by subregion and scenario for 2030

EUE by subregion and scenario for 2030

EUE is the anticipated demand that will not be served due to demand exceeding available energy. It is intended to provide a measure of energy shortfall. In the 67% Additions Scenario, Basin and the Northwest have nearly identical LOLHs; however, Basin’s EUE was 28.1 GWh versus the Northwest’s 12.6 GWh. Basin’s hourly average EUE in the 2030 67% Additions Scenario is slightly over 410 MWh, whereas the Northwest’s hourly average EUE in this scenario is closer to 180 MWh. As such, despite the Northwest having more frequent and longer LOLEvs, the magnitude of energy shortfall in those events is typically shallower than the LOLEvs in Basin. This trend reverses in the High Load Scenario in which Basin shows 29 MWh of EUE over seven LOLHs, whereas the Northwest shows 23.4 GWh of EUE over 218 LOLHs.

EUE by subregion and scenario for 2035

EUE by subregion and scenario for 2035

The 2035 EUE results indicate that the trends identified in 2030 are exacerbated by continued load growth. Basin shows 97.3 GWh of EUE in the 67% Additions Scenario over 147 LOLHs, which is an average of 660 MWh of EUE per LOLH. The Northwest shows 91.4 GWh of EUE over 369 LOLHs, averaging 248 MWh of EUE per LOLH. This again emphasizes that loss of load is anticipated to be a more frequent occurrence in the Northwest but by a smaller margin than experienced in the Basin subregion. Also in the 67% Additions Scenario, the Rocky Mountain subregion shows 4.3 GWh of EUE over 36 LOLHs, which is an average of 120 MWh per LOLH.

In the High Load Scenario, the Northwest’s EUE skyrockets to 157 GWh over 714 LOLHs. The LOLEvs for the Northwest subregion in the High Load Scenario effectively become longer, however result in smaller average EUE per LOLH (220 MWh) than experienced in the 67% Additions Scenario.

Duration

Maximum duration of LOLEvs by subregion and scenario for 2030

Maximum duration of LOLEvs by subregion and scenario for 2030

Average duration of LOLEvs is between one and five hours depending on the scenario and subregion. However, when the maximum duration of LOLEvs is examined, the Northwest stands out. In the 2030 resource addition scenarios, Northwest LOLEvs have a maximum duration of three to seven hours. However, in the High Load Scenario, the Northwest has an LOLEv that lasts 48 consecutive hours in January. Given the cold weather during January and the significant electrification of heating in the Northwest, this is a noteworthy risk.

Maximum duration of LOLEvs by subregion and scenario for 2035

Maximum duration of LOLEvs by subregion and scenario for 2035

In 2035, the Northwest again stands out as the subregion with longest-lasting LOLEvs. The resource addition scenarios all show at least one LOLEv that lasts between 47 and 49 hours. The High Load Scenario for the Northwest shows an LOLEv lasting 128 consecutive hours — equivalent to over five days of outage — in January. This is a significant concern given electricity is a primary fuel for residential heating in the Northwest.

Subregional Data

This section gives a subregional view of present and future resource portfolios, resource additions and retirements, demand forecasts, and loss of load metrics. Loss of load metrics are presented as heat maps that show seasonality, timing, frequency, and magnitude. The loss of load heat maps have been constructed for the years 2030 and 2035 for the All Additions, 67% Additions, and High Load scenarios.

Subregion: Alberta

The Alberta subregion spans the province, which has a population of approximately 5 million. Although its demand peaks in winter, an hour in summer 2024 was within 1.3% of its winter peak and four of the top seven hours were in the summer. There are an estimated 16,369 miles of transmission lines in this subregion.  

Current resource mix

Natural gas dominates the resource mix in the Alberta subregion, with 61% of the installed capacity. Wind generation makes up 25% of the resource mix, while solar and hydro make up 8% and 4%, respectively.

2035 resource mix

If all generating resources included in current resource plans are built, in 2035 natural gas's share of the resource mix will decrease to 45%, while solar's share will increase to 23%. Battery storage is expected to grow from 1% of the resource mix to 3% in 2035.

Planned additions

The subregion is expected to add close to 10 GW of new generation over the coming decade, primarily solar (5 GW) and wind (3 GW).

Planned retirements

No retirements are planned in the Alberta subregion through 2035 according to current resource plans.

Annual and peak demand

Demand in the subregion is forecast to grow by 9% over the coming decade, while peak demand is projected to increase 8%. A major driver of demand growth in this subregion is transportation electrification.

Loss of Load

Alberta saw no loss of load in any of the scenarios.

Resource mix in 2035, if all planned additions are built

Resource mix in 2035, if all planned additions are built

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Projected peak demand, 2026-2035

Projected peak demand, 2026-2035

Subregion: Basin

Basin is a summer-peaking subregion that includes Utah, southern Idaho, and part of western Wyoming. The population of this area is approximately 5.4 million. There are an estimated 15,910 miles of transmission lines in this subregion.


Resource mix

Basin’s resource portfolio as of year-end 2024 is primarily coal and natural gas. The two make up 51% of nameplate capacity in the subregion. Wind and solar make a combined total of 36% of the resource mix, with the remaining portfolio primarily composed of hydro resources.

2035 resource mix

Over the next decade, wind and solar additions are anticipated to shift the resource mix to 51% variable energy resources (VER) and 33% thermal resources. BESSs are anticipated to make up 8% of the resource mix in the subregion by year-end 2035.

Planned additions

Basin has over 15 GW of resource additions planned from 2026 through 2035. Slightly over 40%, or 6 GW, of the planned additions are wind resources, and over 25%, or 4 GW, are solar resources. BESS makes up 18%, or 3 GW, of the resource additions in the subregion, with half of the BESS capacity planned to be added in 2026.

Planned retirements

Approximately 2.2 GW is planned for retirement through 2035, almost half of which are coal (980 MW). 700 MW of wind resources are planned for retirement over the decade, along with 360 MW of natural gas generation.

Annual and peak demand

Demand in the subregion is forecast to grow by almost 26% over the coming decade, while peak demand is projected to increase 18%. Interconnection-wide annual energy load is projected to increase by 25%, and peak energy by 20%. Main contributors to demand growth in the Basin subregion are data centers and semiconductor manufacturing.

Loss of Load

The heat maps below highlight the loss of load in several scenarios.

The heat maps for 2030 and 2035 67% Additions Scenario provide the clearest picture of the risk hours for the subregion. Basin is summer-peaking with peak load generally occuring between 3 p.m. and 4 p.m. However, during the summer, heat can linger after the peak hour, resulting in elevated demand lasting through the evening. Basin’s planned resource additions are primarily wind and solar. The summer is not generally as windy as winter or shoulder seasons, and solar begins to dissipate in the evening. The elevated loads, coupled with a reduction in solar output during the evening hours, and general variability of wind, results in Basin showing the greatest risk to resource adequacy between 5 p.m. and 10 p.m. during July and August. Summer evenings also correspond with elevated demand in the Rocky Mountain and California subregions, lessening import availability from these subregions to Basin and further contributing to the loss of load.

LOLH by month and hour for Basin in the 2035 All Additions Scenario

LOLH by month and hour for Basin in the 2035 All Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for Basin in the 2035 All Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for Basin in the 2035 All Additions Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for Basin in the 2030 67% Additions Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for Basin in the 2030 67% Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for Basin in the 2030 67% Additions Scenario.

EUE by month and hour for Basin in the 2030 67% Additions Scenario.

LOLHs by month and hour for Basin in the 2035 67% Additions Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for Basin in the 2035 67% Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for Basin in the 2035 67% Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for Basin in the 2035 67% Additions Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for Basin in the 2030 High Load Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for Basin in the 2030 High Load Scenario

EUE by month and hour for Basin in the 2030 High Load Scenario

EUE by month and hour for Basin in the 2030 High Load Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for Basin in the 2035 High Load Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for Basin in the 2035 High Load Scenario

EUE by month and hour for Basin in the 2035 High Load Scenario

EUE by month and hour for Basin in the 2035 High Load Scenario

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix in 2035 if all planned resources are built

Resource mix in 2035 if all planned resources are built

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Projected annual demand, 2026-2035

Projected annual demand, 2026-2035

Projected annual demand, 2026-2035

Projected annual demand, 2026-2035

Projected peak demand, 2026-2035

Projected peak demand, 2026-2035

All additions scenario

All additions scenario

All additions scenario

All additions scenario

All additions scenario

All additions scenario

95% scenario

95% scenario

85% scenario

85% scenario

67% Scenario

67% Scenario

Subregion: British Columbia

British Columbia is a winter-peaking area that spans the province, which has a population of approximately 5.7 million. There are an estimated 11,184 miles of transmission lines in this subregion.

Current resource mix

Hydro dominates the resource mix in the British Columbia subregion with 89% of the installed capacity. Biomass makes up 5%, wind 4%, and natural gas 2% of the resource portfolio as of year-end 2024.

2035 resource mix

If all generating resources included in current resource plans are built, in 2035, hydro's share of the resource mix would decrease to 83%, primarily due to a large influx of wind capacity, which would then made up 10% of the resource portfolio.

Planned additions

2.2 GW of new generation is planned in the subregion over the coming decade, including 1.5 GW of wind in 2030. There is also .5 GW of additional hydro capacity planned in 2032.

Planned retirements

Approximately 290 MW of natural gas generation is slated for retirement over the next decade.

Annual and peak demand

Demand in the subregion is forecast to grow by 8% over the coming decade, while peak demand is projected to increase 3.4%. Population growth, transportation and industrial electrification, and natural gas processing all contribute to demand growth in this subregion.

Loss of Load

British Columbia saw no loss of load in any of the scenarios.

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix in 2035, if all planned resources are built

Resource mix in 2035, if all planned resources are built

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Annual demand forecast, 2026-2035

Annual demand forecast, 2026-2035

Peak demand forecast, 2026-2035

Peak demand forecast, 2026-2035

Subregion: California

California is a summer-peaking area that includes most of the state, which has a population of over 42.5 million people. There are an estimated 32,700 miles of transmission lines in this subregion. 

Current resource mix

Natural gas makes up 37% of the resource mix in the California subregion on a nameplate capacity basis, followed by solar, which makes up 24%. Hydro and BESS make up 12% and 11%, respectively. Wind is 8% of the resource mix.

2035 resource mix

If all generating resources included in current resource plans are built, in 2035, natural gas's share of the resource mix will decrease to 25%, while battery storage and wind will each increase to 17% and solar to 26%.

Planned additions

The subregion is expected to add 49 GW of new generation over the coming decade. That includes 19 GW of wind, 15 GW of solar, and 11 GW of BESS. Approximately 2 GW of natural gas and geothermal generation is expected to be added.

Planned retirements

Nearly 6 GW of generation is planned for retirement over the coming decade, nearly all of it natural gas (3.6 GW) and nuclear (2.3 GW).

Annual and peak demand

Demand in the subregion is forecast to grow by 26% over the coming decade, while peak demand is projected to increase 21%. Transportation electrification and the anticipation of additional load during extreme heat events are major factors of demand growth for this subregion.

Loss of Load

The California subregion did not show loss of load in the All Additions or High Load scenarios. California only shows loss of load under the 67% Additions Scenario, and not until 2032, 2033, and 2035. The loss of load heat maps for 2035 for the 67% Additions Scenario are shown below.

California shows two LOLHs in 2035 totaling 471 MWh of EUE in September. This occurs between the hours of 6 and 7 p.m. This time frame is slightly after peak, which generally occurs between 4 and 5 p.m. in this subregion. During the summer, heat can linger after the peak hour, resulting in elevated demand lasting through the evening. California is anticipated to retire 6 GW of natural gas and nuclear capability over the next decade, while adding approximately 34 GW of solar and wind. Solar availability diminishes in the evening, and wind output during this time can vary. The elevated load during summer evenings, coupled with thermal retirements and diminishing solar availability during this period, result in the identified LOLHs shown below.

LOLHs by month and hour for the California subregion in the 2035 67% Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for the California subregion in the 2035 67% Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the California subregion in the 2035 67% Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the California subregion in the 2035 67% Scenario

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix in 2035, if all planned resources are built

Resource mix in 2035, if all planned resources are built

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

67% Scenario

67% Scenario

Subregion: Mexico

Mexico is a summer-peaking area that includes the northern portion of the Mexican state of Baja California, which has a population of 3.8 million people. There are an estimated 1,568 miles of transmission lines in this subregion.

Current resource mix

Natural gas makes up 72% of the resource mix on a capacity basis. This is followed by geothermal at 13%, solar at 8%, and petroleum at 7%.

2035 resource mix

If all generation resources are built according to current resource plans, in 2035, solar's share of the resource mix will increase to 14%, while geothermal and petroleum will decline to 9% and 4%, respectively. Natural gas remains at 72%.

Planned additions

600 MW of solar is planned to be built over the coming decade in the Mexico subregion. This occurs primarily in years 2026 and 2028.

Planned retirements

The subregion has no retirements through 2035.

Annual and peak demand

Demand in the subregion is forecast to grow 45% over the coming decade, while peak demand is projected to increase 41%. The anticipation of additional load during extreme heat events is the major factor driving demand growth for this subregion.

Loss of Load

The Mexico subregion only shows loss of load under the 67% Additions Scenario in years 2034 and 2035. The loss of load heat maps for 2035 are provided below for the 67% Additions Scenario.

Mexico is a summer-peaking subregion that generally experiences peak load between 4 and 5 p.m. August is typically the hottest month in the subregion, thereby experiencing the greatest demand. Similar to California and Basin, summer heat can last beyond the peak hour, resulting in elevated demand through the evening. Solar is diminished during this period, and solar resources are the only additions planned for this subregion. The significant increase in demand over the next 10 years, coupled with the solar resource additions, which have diminished efficacy as daylight wanes, are the primary reason for the LOLHs during summer evenings after peak. The California subregion does support Mexico if there is surplus energy to do so, but despite the Mexico subregion importing up to the transfer limit from California, loss of load still occurs.

LOLHs by month and hour for the Mexico subregion in the 2035 67% Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for the Mexico subregion in the 2035 67% Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Mexico subregion in the 2035 67% Scenario.

EUE by month and hour for the Mexico subregion in the 2035 67% Scenario.

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix in 2035 if all planned resources are built

Resource mix in 2035 if all planned resources are built

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Annual demand forecast. 2026-2035

Annual demand forecast. 2026-2035

Peak demand forecast, 2026-2035

Peak demand forecast, 2026-2035

67% scenario

67% scenario

Subregion: Northwest

Northwest is a winter-peaking area that includes Montana, Oregon, Washington, and parts of northern California and Idaho. The population of the subregion is approximately 13.7 million. There are 16 Balancing Authorities in this subregion, which has an estimated 32,751 miles of transmission lines.

Current resource mix

As of year-end 2024, the Northwest’s resource portfolio primarily consists of hydro, natural gas, and wind resources. Hydro resources are a significant contributor to the Northwest’s energy supply making up 55% of the resource portfolio. Natural gas makes up 18%, and wind accounts for 16%.  

2035 resource mix

Resource plans indicate a significant influx of wind, solar, and BESS resources by year-end 2035. Wind grows to a 27% portfolio share, BESS increases to 6%, and solar increases to 9%.

Planned additions

14 GW of new generation is planned in the subregion over the coming decade, including almost 8 GW of wind and 3 GW of battery storage.

Planned retirements

The Northwest has approximately 340 MW of retirements slated to occur between 2026 and 2035. Over one-third of these retirements is biomass facilities. Hydro, wind, and solar retirements make up approximately half the retirements. It is worth noting that part of the renewable retirements may be repowers or non-renewals of purchase power agreements. The remaining retirements are primarily natural gas resources, the majority of which are set to retire in 2035.

Annual and peak demand

Demand in the subregion is forecast to grow by 24% over the coming decade, while peak demand is projected to increase 21%. Major drivers of demand growth in the Northwest include data centers, residential and transportation electrification, customer growth, and semiconductor manufacturing.

Loss of Load

The Northwest shows loss of load in all scenarios beginning as early as 2028 in the 67% Additions Scenario. Heat maps showing the timing and seasonal loss of load are provided below for the 2030 and 2035 All Additions, 67% Additions, and High Load scenarios.

The Northwest is unique in that it experiences loss of load in the summer and winter in all scenarios, as well as the shoulder seasons in the High Load Scenario. The Northwest is also unique because, over the last decade, it has experienced system peaks both during the morning ramp (between 7 and 10 a.m.), which are more typical, and during the evening between 5 and 6 p.m. Morning ramps in the winter coincide with the greatest frequency of loss of load, whereas in the summer, the evening peak hours are when the greatest energy shortfalls are projected to occur. LOLHs and LOLEvs are greatest in the winter months, primarily in January and December, indicating that these months have a higher propensity for loss of load. Electricity is the predominant source of heat in the Northwest subregion, with the coldest temperatures occurring in the early morning and again dropping in the evening. In the winter, solar primarily contributes between the hours of 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., coinciding with the hours of greatest demand. Solar irradiance is weaker during the winter, which also lessens the contribution from solar resources. Wind makes up over 50% of the projected resource additions for the subregion, however these resources have the highest variability in energy output compared to other VERs. Wind can be prone to icing or overspeed during extreme cold weather events, which may minimize their availability during periods of elevated load. The significant demand associated with heating electrification, coupled with the timing of solar output and high wind variability, are the main drivers of LOLHs during the winter. In the summer, the primary driver of LOLHs is solar availability diminishing in the evening during periods of elevated demand. Given that BESS resources are modeled as being fully available for discharge, and that the All Additions Scenario shows LOLHs, these results indicate that the Northwest will need additional resources to meet demand over the next decade.

The California, Alberta, and British Columbia subregions support the Northwest during the morning winter ramps and evenings. However, transfer limitations from these subregions are frequently reached when attempting to mitigate loss of load in the Northwest, preventing further support to the subregion. In the summer, the California and Rocky Mountain subregions must meet their own native load obligations in the evenings, and can only provide limited support to the Northwest. The Alberta subregion also assists the Northwest during summer evenings but runs into transfer limitations. Beyond additional resources, additional transfer capability to the Northwest would also help reduce the projected loss of load in the subregion.

LOLHs by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2030 All Additions Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2030 All Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2030 All Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2030 All Additions Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2035 All Additions Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2035 All Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2035 All Additions Scenario.

EUE by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2035 All Additions Scenario.

LOLHs by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2030 67% Additions Scenario.

LOLHs by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2030 67% Additions Scenario.

EUE by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2030 67% Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2030 67% Additions Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2035 67% Additions Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2035 67% Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2035 67% Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2035 67% Additions Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2030 High Load Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2030 High Load Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2030 High Load Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2030 High Load Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2035 High Load Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2035 High Load Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2035 High Load Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Northwest in the 2035 High Load Scenario

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix in 2035 if all planned resources are built

Resource mix in 2035 if all planned resources are built

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Annual demand forecast, 2026-2035

Annual demand forecast, 2026-2035

Peak demand forecast, 2026-2035

Peak demand forecast, 2026-2035

All Additions Scenario

All Additions Scenario

95% Scenario

95% Scenario

85% Scenario

85% Scenario

67% scenario

67% scenario

Subregion: Rocky Mountain

Rocky Mountain is a summer-peaking area that includes Colorado, most of Wyoming, and parts of Nebraska and South Dakota. The population of the area is approximately 6.7 million. There are an estimated 18,800 miles of transmission lines in this subregion.

Current resource mix

On a capacity basis, the resource portfolio in the Rocky Mountain subregion primarily consists of natural gas, coal, and wind resources. Natural gas and coal together make up 55% of the resource mix, with wind at 21%. Solar and hydro each make up 10%. Battery storage is at 1%.

2035 resource mix

If all generation resources are built according to current resource plans, the capacity of thermal generation in the subregion will decrease to 40%, from 55% today. Wind would increase to 31% of the resource mix, while solar would increase to 14% and BESS to 6%.

Planned additions

15 GW of new resources is planned in the subregion over the coming decade, including almost 8 GW of wind and 3 GW of both natural gas and solar.

Planned retirements

Over 6 GW of generation is planned for retirement over the coming decade, including 2.8 GW of coal and 1.7 GW of both natural gas and wind.

Annual and peak demand

Demand in the subregion is forecast to grow by 27% over the coming decade, while peak demand is projected to increase 23%. Major drivers of demand growth in the Rocky Mountain subregion include data centers, as well as commercial and industrial customer growth.

Loss of Load

The Rocky Mountain subregion does not show loss of load in the All Additions or High Load scenarios. This subregion shows loss of load under the 67% Additions Scenario for years 2030 through 2035, as well as one LOLH in 2034 and 2035 of the 85% Additions Scenario. The loss of load heat maps for the 2030 and 2035 67% Additions Scenario are provided below.

The Rocky Mountain subregion shows one LOLH for 5 MWh of EUE in 2030 and 18 LOLHs for 4,297 MWh of EUE in 2035 in the 67% Additions Scenario. The LOLHs occur between the hours of 4 and 9 p.m., primarily in July and August. This time frame includes the peak hour, which is anticipated to occur in the summer between 4 and 5 p.m. The Rocky Mountain subregion is showing a significant increase in both its annual demand and peak hour forecasts. The 2035 peak hour demand is projected at over 3 GW higher than last year’s forecast, and the annual demand totals close to 13 TWh higher than last year’s forecast. Similar to other subregions showing LOLHs during and shortly after their summer evening peak, these LOLHs are primarily a product of demand remaining elevated while solar output diminishes. In addition, there are over 6 GW of resource retirements with 4.5 GW of that being thermal resources. The additions in the 67% Additions Scenario total about 10 GW, with close to 7 GW of that being VERs. The reduction in additions, coupled with the increased uncertainty in energy output and unchanged retirements in the 67% Additions Scenario, also contribute to the LOLHs projected for this subregion.

LOLHs by month and hour in the 2030 67% Additions Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour in the 2030 67% Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Rocky Mountain subregion in the 2030 67% Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Rocky Mountain subregion in the 2030 67% Additions Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for the Rocky Mountain subregion in the 2035 67% Additions Scenario

LOLHs by month and hour for the Rocky Mountain subregion in the 2035 67% Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Rocky Mountain subregion in the 2035 67% Additions Scenario

EUE by month and hour for the Rocky Mountain subregion in the 2035 67% Additions Scenario

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix in 2035, if all planned generation is built

Resource mix in 2035, if all planned generation is built

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Annual energy demand forecast, 2026-2035

Annual energy demand forecast, 2026-2035

Peak demand forecast, 2026-2035

Peak demand forecast, 2026-2035

85% Scenario

85% Scenario

85% Scenario

85% Scenario

67% scenario

67% scenario

67% scenario

67% scenario

Subregion: Southwest

Southwest is a summer-peaking area that includes all of Arizona and New Mexico, most of Nevada, and a small part of Texas. The area has a population of approximately 13.6 million. There are an estimated 23,100 miles of transmission lines in this subregion.

Current resource mix

As of year-end 2024, natural gas makes up almost half of the resource mix in the subregion (46%), while solar makes up 16%. Coal, wind, nuclear, and BESS make up between 7% and 9% each of the current resource mix.

2035 resource mix

If all generation resources are built according to current resource plans, in 2035, the resource mix will comprise 22% natural gas, 37% solar, and 18% battery storage. Along with natural gas's significant decline in the share of the resource mix, coal is expected to drop from 9% today to 4% in 2035.

Planned additions

70 GW of new resources are planned in the subregion over the coming decade, more than in any other subregion. Over half of the planned additions are solar (37 GW). 17 GW of BESS is planned, and 10 GW of wind.

In addition, 40 GW of the planned additions are tier 3 resources, which are more speculative.

Planned retirements

7 GW of generation is planned for retirement over the coming decade, including 3 GW of coal and 2 GW of natural gas.

Annual and peak demand

Demand in the subregion is forecast to grow 42% over the coming decade, while peak demand is projected to increase 29%. The major drivers of demand growth in the Southwest subregion include data centers, industrial and residential electrification, and residential customer growth.

Loss of Load

The subregion did not show loss of load in any scenario over the coming decade.

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix, year-end 2024

Resource mix in 2035, if all planned resources are built

Resource mix in 2035, if all planned resources are built

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned resource additions, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Planned retirements, 2026-2035

Annual demand forecast, 2026-2035

Annual demand forecast, 2026-2035

Peak demand forecast, 2026-2035

Peak demand forecast, 2026-2035

Transfers

Transfers by subregion for years 2030 and 2035 for the All Additions, 67% Additions, and the High Load scenarios are provided below. Transfers are separated into imports and exports and shown both by month and by hour of the day.

The Northwest shows the greatest amount of imports in all scenarios. This is particularly true in the winter months during the morning and evening ramps. As discussed in the Northwest Loss of Load Section, winter mornings and evenings are the times when this subregion experiences most of its loss of load. MAVRIC’s transfer logic only allows for transfers when loss of load is identified for an area in an islanded state. Therefore, the timing and magnitude of imports align with the periods of greatest need for a subregion. Most of the transfers to the Northwest come from the California subregion, specifically during the morning ramp hours of the winter months when the California subregion has surplus energy. There are times where the transfer limits from the California subregion to the Northwest are met, and Alberta, British Columbia, and Rocky Mountain subregions also support the Northwest. However, transfer limits from the Alberta and British Columbia subregions to the Northwest are frequently reached when attempting to mitigate loss of load in the Northwest. This indicates that additional transfer capability to the Northwest from the California, Alberta, or British Columbia subregions would help alleviate winter LOLHs.

Summer evenings in the Northwest appear to be partially supported by the California subregion as well. However, the California subregion’s ability to export during the evening becomes limited due to diminished solar and elevated native load. In other words, transfer limits to the Northwest from California during summer evenings are rarely met, as California is satisfying its obligations rather than exporting power. With less support from the California subregion, the Northwest leans more heavily on Alberta and the Rocky Mountain subregion for support. The Alberta subregion appears to hit its transfer limits to the Northwest frequently during summer evenings, indicating that loss of load could partially be alleviated with additional transfer capability from Alberta to the Northwest. The Rocky Mountain subregion can assist during summer evenings to an extent but does not hit its transfer limits to the Northwest. This indicates that, like California, the Rocky Mountain subregion must also meet its native load during summer evenings and can only provide limited support to the Northwest.

Basin also shows loss of load in all scenarios, primarily during summer evenings in the latter years of the Western Assessment. As such, Basin is primarily shown to import energy from June through August during and after its evening peak. During these hours, external transfers are sourced from the Rocky Mountain, Southwest, and California subregions. The Southwest subregion maxes out its transfer capability to Basin during the summer evening hours, indicating that there may be additional energy in the Southwest that could be provided to Basin if additional transfer capability were available. The Rocky Mountain and California subregions do not meet their transfer limits when assisting Basin on summer evenings, indicating that these subregions are meeting native load obligations with available resources rather than providing surplus energy to Basin. This is exacerbated in the High Load Scenario, in which transfers from the Rocky Mountain and California subregions become even more limited, resulting in an increase in LOLHs within the Basin subregion. This is despite Basin not having additional speculative large load demand in the subregion itself.

The Southwest shows a significant bump in exports during summer evenings in 2035 of the 67% Additions and High Load scenarios. Most of this increase in export activity is to support both the Basin and Rocky Mountain subregions. Mexico displays a notable increase in its imports in the 2035 67% Scenario, which are primarily fulfilled by the California subregion. Many LOLHs in the Mexico subregion occur despite the California subregion exporting up to its transfer limit to the Mexico subregion.

All Additions

Subregional transfers by month and time of day for the 2030 All Additions Scenario

Subregional transfers by month and time of day for the 2030 All Additions Scenario

Subregional transfers by month and time of day for the 2035 All Additions Scenario

Subregional transfers by month and time of day for the 2035 All Additions Scenario

67% Additions

Subregional transfers by month and time of day for the 2030 67% Additions Scenario

Subregional transfers by month and time of day for the 2030 67% Additions Scenario

Subregional transfers by month and time of day for the 2035 67% Additions Scenario

Subregional transfers by month and time of day for the 2035 67% Additions Scenario

High Load

Subregional transfers by month and time of day for the 2030 High Load Scenario

Subregional transfers by month and time of day for the 2030 High Load Scenario

Subregional transfers by month and time of day for the 2035 High Load Scenario

Subregional transfers by month and time of day for the 2035 High Load Scenario

Methods & Data

  • Read the methodology used in this assessment.
  • Read the glossary of terms used in this assessment.
  • This year's Western Assessment uses eight new subregional boundaries that better align with operational and planning realities and are consistent with other WECC assessments.   
  • This assessment uses Loads & Resources data provided by the Balancing Authorities in early 2025.
WECC logo